Scalise, McKinley Introduce Anti-Carbon Tax Resolution

f t # e
Washington, April 28, 2018 | comments
House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) and Rep. David McKinley (R-WV) on Thursday introduced H. Con. Res. 119, which “Expresses the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to American families and businesses and is not in the best interest of the United States.”
share: f t
House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) and Rep. David McKinley (R-WV) on Thursday introduced H. Con. Res. 119, which “Expresses the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to American families and businesses and is not in the best interest of the United States.”

The concise (one-page) resolution finds that a carbon tax is a tax on the fuels that provide 81 percent of all U.S. energy, will increase the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home heating oil, will force consumers to pay more for necessities like food, gasoline, and electricity, will lead to less economic growth and more businesses and jobs moving overseas, will impose disproportionate burdens on industries in energy-intensive manufacturing regions, and will fall most heavily on the poor, the elderly, and other persons on fixed incomes. The resolution also spotlights the incompatibility between a carbon tax and the energy production boom that undergirds U.S. competitiveness.

In a press release supporting the resolution, I note that a carbon tax is like all other “progressive” climate policies. All ratchet up over time until their politically-disfavored victims are financially depleted and politically marginalized. In short, a carbon tax is a form of economic warfare waged by the government against otherwise perfectly lawful enterprises. That is not how business is done in a free society.

Click here to read the full article.
f t # e

Stay Connected

Use the form below to sign up for my newsletter and get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.